How to Talk to “The Enemy” with Larry Rosen

Politics can feel like a loyalty test now. Like you are either on the right team, or you are a threat.

That is why talking with Larry Rosen felt so grounding. Larry is an attorney turned mediator, and he is the host of The Enemies Project, a YouTube docuseries where he brings together people who see each other as enemies and helps them find the humanity underneath the issue.

What Larry has discovered, over and over, is that conflict is rarely just about the issue on the surface. People are usually protecting something. A family. A community. A belief that kept them safe once. A story about who the “good guys” are. When you do not understand the “why” underneath someone’s position, you fill the gap with the worst possible explanation. You assume the other person is cruel on purpose. You mistake effect for intention. The hurt is real, but the story we tell ourselves about why it happened is often wrong, and that story becomes the fuel for everything that follows.

That is basically the engine of The Enemies Project. Larry brings in two people who represent a deep social conflict and lets the tension show up properly. It’s not the polite version where everyone performs being reasonable, but the honest version where people say the thing they are not supposed to say out loud. Because when people suppress the conflict, they do not actually move. They just leave with their talking points intact.

Then he does the part that feels almost impossible in our current culture. He takes them away from the issue and builds rapport first. His belief is simple: you cannot have politics without rapport. Without safety, the nervous system goes into threat mode and the goal becomes defeating the other person, not understanding them. In threat mode, you are not even trying to learn. You are trying to win.

In safe mode, something else becomes possible. Larry’s method is extreme perspective taking. He helps each person explain what is deeply important to them, who they are trying to protect, what shaped them, what scares them, and what they wish the other side understood. He has a phrase for it that stuck with us: politics grows out of the soil of the person. When you see the soil, the politics stops feeling like a random set of evil opinions and starts looking like a human response to a life.

And then he pushes it further. He has them switch sides. He calls it identity confusion and they do it for long enough to feel how the other person’s worldview makes sense from the inside. It does not magically create agreement, but it often creates something that is rarer right now: respect. Sometimes even admiration. Once you have inhabited someone’s logic, it is harder to keep them as a cartoon.

We asked the uncomfortable question people always ask when they see this kind of work. Are you legitimizing dangerous views by giving them airtime? Are you platforming the oppressor? How do you protect the person in the room who has been harmed by the other side?

Larry did not pretend the work was risk-free. He talked about the reality that participants can get attacked by their own side for even showing up, and he acknowledged that sometimes the impact lands later, after the cameras are off. But he kept coming back to effectiveness. If you want to change society, you do not convince the other side by rebuking them into silence. You might rally your own side into a war, and if you can win it, you can get things done. But in a country where the other side is not going away, the swings keep coming. You think you won, and then they come back for you.

His point was that ignoring people confirms their worst fears. It feeds the enemy-making machine. And he named the enemy makers directly: political and media figures who profit from division by constantly insinuating that the other side is evil, selfish, corrupt, and a threat. Normal disagreement becomes a moral war, and once you are in a moral war, curiosity feels like betrayal.

This is where Larry reframed the whole “bridging” world for us. He thinks a lot of it is aimed at the choir, people who already want to talk. Most people are not interested in wonky terms like depolarization. They are interested in healing. They want healthy relationships. They want to be listened to. They want to feel like they belong.

So his theory of change is the media. He called it experience multiplication. You cannot get millions of people to sit down and do what he does in a room. They will not. But you can multiply the experience by however many people watch. You can show people a different way to be, and let them feel the difference in their own body.

He also said something we have felt in our own work. People say they want healing, but they are drawn to conflict. So the formula has to include conflict that leads somewhere. Not conflict for sport. Conflict that ends in something recognisably human.

Because underneath all the politics, that is what we are missing. Not agreement. Not perfect policies. Just the ability to see each other as people, to feel safe enough to be curious, and to remember that most of us are trying to protect someone we love.

RESOURCES MENTIONED:

https://www.enemiesproject.org/

Larry's Good for the Soul: 

https://youtube.com/shorts/aFuuyibkx1Q?si=MhVJvWhH5SMGPDdb 

LINKS:

On Instagram https://www.instagram.com/wevegottotalk/ 

On YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@WeveGotToTalk

On Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/weve-got-to-talk/id1797423701

On Spotify:  https://open.spotify.com/show/0qJVgTvjciUffRmoUienx2

How to find Nicole https://nicolefonarow.com/

How to find Jolene https://dibledough.com/

How to find Nicole
How to find Jolene

YouTube

Next
Next

If We Were President: 3 Laws That We Think Would Fix America