U.S. Surrogacy and Birthright Citizenship: When Money Writes the Rules

When does “building a family” start looking like an industry and who gets protected when it does?

Surrogacy in the United States is one of those topics that forces you to hold multiple truths at once. The U.S. has become a major global destination for surrogacy, in part because the rules are inconsistent and, in many places, surprisingly permissive. In other words, the industry has grown faster than the guardrails. That creates a system where the wealthy get options, the vulnerable take on risk, and everyone pretends a contract is the same thing as protection.

In many countries, international surrogacy is restricted or illegal. In the U.S., it’s treated more like an industry—complete with agencies, contracts, lawyers, and pricing tiers.

The 14th Amendment exists for a reason: to guarantee birthright citizenship and protect people from being treated as permanent outsiders. It’s one of the most important promises America ever made.

But here’s the hard question: what happens when a right designed to protect the vulnerable becomes a tool for the powerful?

If wealthy foreign nationals can use U.S. surrogacy to ensure their children are born on American soil, then citizenship starts to look less like a shared national principle and more like something that can be purchased if you have enough money and the right legal team. That should bother people across the spectrum, even if they disagree on immigration more broadly.

The answer isn’t to demonize babies or parents. Children are not political weapons. But it is fair to ask whether we’ve created a system where money can effectively buy access to American citizenship while ordinary families can’t buy access to basic healthcare.

If we’re worried about foreign influence, why would we ignore a pathway that could create U.S. citizens at scale through a loosely regulated market? We can debate motives all day, but the vulnerability is obvious: a system with high stakes and low oversight invites exploitation.

When surrogacy becomes a business at scale, the power imbalance matters. The intended parents often have money, legal representation, and social status. The surrogate may have financial pressure, limited bargaining power, and fewer protections if something goes wrong - medically, emotionally, or legally.

Pregnancy is not a casual service. It’s a serious medical event. It carries risk. It changes bodies. It can change lives. So if we’re going to allow this industry to operate, the bare minimum is robust protection for the women doing the carrying and clear, enforceable standards that prioritize the well-being of the child.

That means questions nobody wants to ask out loud:
What happens if a surrogate’s health is at risk and the contract pressures her to continue?
What happens if the baby has medical complications and the intended parents back out?
What happens if the surrogate is treated like an employee but without employee rights?
What happens when the “choice” is driven by financial desperation?

This is where we actually meet in the middle as a Liberal on one side and a Conservative on the other: regulation isn’t anti-family. It’s pro-accountability.

You can support surrogacy as a path to parenthood and still believe it needs guardrails. You can believe in bodily autonomy and believe women shouldn’t be treated like rentable wombs. You can believe in birthright citizenship and believe we shouldn’t create a marketplace that turns it into a perk for billionaires.

Other countries are already tightening their approach. The U.S. doesn’t have to copy anyone else’s model, but pretending this is fine as-is feels like willful blindness.

So What Now?

We’re not pretending this issue has simple answers. It doesn’t. Surrogacy sits at the intersection of infertility, LGBTQ+ family-building, women’s rights, global inequality, immigration, and geopolitics. 

If you’re listening to this and feeling torn, good. That means you’re thinking. The goal isn’t to land on a team. The goal is to ask better questions, especially about who benefits, who bears the risk, and who gets protected when things go sideways.

And if there’s one thing we’ll say with our whole chest: children should never be treated like commodities, and women should never be treated like infrastructure.

If this topic hits a nerve for you whether you’re pro-surrogacy, anti-surrogacy, or somewhere in the middle, talk about it. Write to your representatives. Ask what laws exist in your state. Ask what protections surrogates have. Ask what happens when contracts collide with medical reality. Because the only way this changes is if more people are willing to look at it without flinching.


RESOURCES MENTIONED:

Good for the Soul

Episode Graphic Photo Credits:

  • Pavel Durov photo: Pavel Durov Instagram

  • Peter Thiel photo: Gage Skidmore from Surprise, AZ, United States of America, CC BY-SA 2.0 via Wikimedia Commons

  • Xu Bo photo: Weibo

  • Elon Musk photo: The Royal Society, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons

How to find Nicole
How to find Jolene

YouTube

Previous
Previous

Is American Buying Greenland or not?!

Next
Next

2026 Is Already a Lot: Venezuela, ICE Shootings, Minnesota Fraud and Iran Uprising